Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of a preoperative conversational hypnotic session on propofol consumption using closed-loop anesthetic induction guided by the bispectral index
- Source :
- Medicine. 96:e6389
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2017.
-
Abstract
- Objective The automated administration of propofol in a closed loop could be used to objectively evaluate the nonpharmacological anesthetic action of hypnotherapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a conversational hypnosis session on the consumption of propofol for anesthetic induction. Design A randomized, usual care-controlled, single-center, patient-blind trial. Setting Tertiary care center in France from November 2012 to December 2013. Participants Adult patients scheduled for a surgical procedure under general anesthesia. Interventions Before surgery, patients were randomized with a computer-generated random list for a preoperative conversational hypnosis session or for usual care. The conversational hypnosis session was conducted and individualized by the therapist with an academic degree in hypnosis in a quiet environment. Anesthetic induction was automatically performed by propofol without opioids and was assisted by the bispectral index in a closed loop. Outcome Primary endpoint was the propofol dose required for anesthesia induction, defined as a Bispectral index less than 60 for at least 30 seconds. Results The study included 48 patients in the hypnosis group and 49 patients in the control group. No difference in propofol consumption to obtain anesthesia induction was observed between the groups (total dose: 138.6 [67.5] and 130 [47.9] mg, P = .47; adjusted dose: 2.15 [1.09] and 1.95 [0.66] mg/kg, P = .28, for the hypnosis and control groups, respectively). Hetero-evaluation of arm movement during propofol injection (no reaction: 98% and 74%; P = .004, in the hypnosis and control groups, respectively) and face reaction at venous access placement (no reaction 59% and 30%; P = .017, in the hypnosis and control groups, respectively) were lower in the hypnosis group. No adverse event was reported. Conclusions No difference in propofol consumption was observed in this study designed to evaluate the effect of a hypnotic conversational session on anesthesia induction using an automated tool for propofol administration.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Hypnosis
business.industry
medicine.drug_class
General Medicine
Preoperative care
law.invention
Hypnotic
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
030202 anesthesiology
law
Bispectral index
Anesthesia
Anesthetic
Physical therapy
medicine
Clinical endpoint
business
Propofol
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00257974
- Volume :
- 96
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........1b5d5bdcaa92b739da9efa8b54ff6be2
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000006389