A Correction to 'Some Gabidulin Codes Cannot be List Decoded Efficiently at any Radius'

There is an error in the above titled paper [1] . As a result, the main statement of the paper is true for a subset of the Gabidulin codes for which it was initially stated. To be precise, our results on the list decodability still hold for the same parameters of $n$ and $m$ , but the evaluation points have to be of a certain structure.