Back to Search Start Over

Patch-Test Reactions to Topical Anesthetics: Retrospective Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data, 2001 to 2004

Authors :
Erin M. Warshaw
Donald V. Belsito
Denis Sasseville
Kathryn A. Zug
C. G.Toby Mathias
James S. Taylor
Sarah E. Schram
Howard I. Maibach
Melanie D. Pratt
Joseph F. Fowler
Vincent A. DeLeo
Frances J. Storrs
James G. Marks
Robert L. Rietschel
Source :
Dermatitis. 19:81-95
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Mary Ann Liebert Inc, 2008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Allergy to topical anesthetics is not uncommon. The cross-reactivity among topical anesthetics and the screening value of benzocaine alone are not well understood. OBJECTIVES The goals for this study were: (1) to evaluate the frequency and pattern of allergic patch-test reactions to topical anesthetics, using North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data, and (2) to compare these results to allergen frequencies from other published studies. METHODS The NACDG patch-tested 10,061 patients between 2001 and 2004. In this analysis patients were included who had positive patch-test reactions to one or more of the following: benzocaine, lidocaine, dibucaine, tetracaine, and prilocaine. RESULTS Of patch-tested patients, 344 (3.4%) had an allergic reaction to at least one anesthetic. Of those, 320 (93.0%) had an allergic reaction to only one topical anesthetic. Overall, reactions to benzocaine (50.0%, 172 of 344) were most prevalent, followed by reactions to dibucaine (27.9%, 96 of 344); however, reactions to dibucaine were significantly more frequent in Canada than in the United States (relative risk [RR], 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67-3.20; p < .0001). Of patients reacting to more than one anesthetic, most (79%, 19 of 24) reacted to both an amide and an ester. CONCLUSIONS Of the topical anesthetics tested, benzocaine was the most frequent allergen overall. Over 50% of allergic reactions to topical anesthetics in this study would have been missed had benzocaine been used as a single screening agent. Cross-reactivity patterns were not consistent with structural groups.

Details

ISSN :
17103568
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Dermatitis
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........1f231f4778ccff893cebb6c16d614d03
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2007.06072