Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Use and Atrophy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Topic To summarize the rates of atrophy, risk factors, and atrophy-associated visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who received anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for macular neovascularization (MNV). Clinical Relevance Age-related macular degeneration is a leading cause of vision loss worldwide, and VEGF inhibitors are the primary treatment for nAMD. However, atrophy is observed frequently in eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy, prompting questions regarding a causative role for these therapies in atrophy development. Methods PubMed was searched for articles published in the past 5 years (January 1, 2014, through January 10, 2019). Studies including atrophy outcome(s) in patients with age-related macular degeneration who received anti-VEGF treatment were included. Review articles, retrospective studies, case reports or studies, preclinical studies, prevalence data reports, and non-English studies were excluded. Randomization was not required. Results Overall, 145 studies were identified; 29 publications were included, with cohorts ranging from 8 to 1185 eyes. Imaging methods used to assess atrophy varied across studies. All studies confirmed the occurrence of atrophy, and when available, longitudinal data from the included studies demonstrated an increase in atrophy incidence over time. Key risk factors or phenotypes associated with atrophy were fellow eye atrophy, reticular pseudodrusen, increased injections, and type 3 lesion. In addition, visual acuity loss was noted with foveal atrophy. Discussion All studies demonstrated that atrophy occurs in the context of MNV treated with anti-VEGF therapy; however, it is not clear whether anti-VEGF treatment is causative of atrophy versus being associated with atrophy development. The included studies were not designed or powered to assess atrophy as a primary outcome. In addition, it is difficult to determine whether prognostic factors directly affect atrophy. Furthermore, patient populations in clinical trials do not necessarily represent real-world patients. Although phenotypes and risk factors may help to identify those at greater risk of atrophy developing, it is important to recognize that adequately treating exudative MNV remains the best option to optimize vision outcomes in patients with nAMD, particularly given the risk of vision loss with undertreatment observed in the real world.