Back to Search Start Over

Training, Credentialing, Proctoring and Medicolegal Risks of Robotic Urological Surgery: Recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons

Authors :
David I. Lee
Thomas E. Ahlering
Vipul R. Patel
Benjamin R. Lee
Erik P. Castle
Carson Wong
Chandru P. Sundaram
Fatih Atug
Ali Riza Kural
Kevin C. Zorn
Raju Thomas
Surena F. Matin
Raymond J. Leveillee
Scott E. Eggener
Peter Wiklund
Matthew T. Gettman
David M. Albala
Gagan Gautam
Alex Mottrie
Jean V. Joseph
Koon Ho Rha
Arieh L. Shalhav
Gopal H. Badlani
Howard N. Winfield
Ralph V. Clayman
Source :
Journal of Urology. 182:1126-1132
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2009.

Abstract

Purpose: With the exponential growth of robotic urological surgery, particularly with robot assisted radical prostatectomy, guidelines for safe initiation of this technology are a necessity. Currently no standardized credentialing system exists to our knowledge to evaluate surgeon competency and safety with robotic urological surgery performance. Although proctoring is a modality by which such competency can be evaluated, other training tools and guidelines are needed to ensure that the requisite knowledge and technical skills to perform this procedure have been acquired. We evaluated the current status of proctoring and credentialing in other surgical specialties to discuss and recommend its application and implementation specifically for robot assisted radical prostatectomy.Materials and Methods: We reviewed the literature on safety and medicolegal implications of proctoring and the safe introduction of surgical procedures to develop recommendations for robot assisted radical prostatectomy proctoring an...

Details

ISSN :
15273792 and 00225347
Volume :
182
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........23ed404f859decbc571c642d7204ba27
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.042