360 CARDIOMEMS HF SYSTEM: CONTINUOUS REMOTE MONITORING FOR OPTIMIZE HF PATIENTS' MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCES CONSUMPTION

Background Heart failure (HF) alternates phases of stability and phases of exacerbation, with a progressive decline in the patient's functional capacity and quality of life; the need to anticipate and improve the effectiveness of management of HF exacerbation has led to the development of several remote monitoring tools. We report our experience with CardioMEMS HF system (implantable device to monitor changes in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PAPd) as early indicator of the onset of worsening HF) in order to optimize the pharmaceutical treatments strategy (e.g. Levosimendan infusion) and to assess the impact on hospital resources consumption and costs. Methods We enrolled 7 patients (69.00±4.88 years; 30% female) with end-stage HF, implanted with CardioMEMS and daily monitored remotely, in order to optimize both tailored adjustment of home therapy and infusions of Levosimendan. More in detail, if the cardiologist detected a tendency for PAPd to rise, patients were contacted for home therapeutic changes. If no further changes were possible, the patient was hospitalized for the infusion of Levosimendan. In order to calculate the impact of this remote monitoring strategy on resources consumption, we collected data on hospitalizations (e.g. causes, numbers, length, high-cost drugs and costs) taking into account the same number of months pre and post-CardioMEMS implant for each patient. Results Following the implantation of CardioMEMS we observed a 45% reduction in the total number of hospitalizations and a 62% reduction in the days of hospitalization (from a total of 421 days before implantation to a total of 159 days post implantation in the observation period). From an economic point of view, a significant hospital cost reduction was recorded in terms of both hospitalization costs (HF related re-hospitalization and CardioMEMS's implant related cost) and drugs infusion costs (hospital stay and drug costs); more specifically, the total savings for the 7 patients are around € 236,000 and total days of hospitalization avoided are around 500 days including the hospitalizations avoided for drugs infusion. Accordingly, was recorded an improvement in patients’ quality of life measured with EQ5D (pre-implantation 75.17±2.06 vs post-implantation 108.60±8.70, p 0.0078). Conclusions Our preliminary results support the usefulness of this system in the remote management of the HF patients and in the re-hospitalization reduction both for exacerbation and drug management. In fact, the parameters’ monitoring through the CardioMEMS device allows a personalized management of drug therapy; more precisely, considering the drug Levosimendan, instead of a periodic standard timing for infusion, a patient-tailored timing of infusion was applied. In conclusion, our innovative strategy contributes to achieve the organizational efficiency of the healthcare facilities, as well as to the adequate use and allocation of financial and human resources with a better outcome for HF patients.