Back to Search
Start Over
Standardization of inpatient CPR status discussions and documentation within the Division of Hematology and Oncology at UPMC Shadyside Hospital
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35:147-147
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2017.
-
Abstract
- 147 Background: Medical professionals are trained to provide life-sustaining and cardiac resuscitation measures for admitted hospital patients. However, not all patients desire such aggressive measures. Lack of discussion and/or documentation about resuscitation preferences has led to care incongruous with patient’s wishes as previously documented or reported to providers or family members. In December 2016, 49% of adult patients admitted to the inpatient oncology service at UPMC Shadyside had a code status discussion documented prior to discharge. The aim of this project is to improve the quality and rates of CPR status conversations. Methods: A workgroup was formed in January 2017 among key stakeholders representing oncology physicians and fellows, palliative care faculty, oncology nursing, advance practice providers (APPs), and internal medicine house staff. A quality improvement (QI) proposal was developed and approved by the UPMC Quality Improvement Committee in February 2017. All oncology faculty, fellows, housestaff, and APPs were reminded weekly to complete CPR status conversations and documentation. APPs were formally trained by palliative care specialists to discuss and document CPR/code status with all admitted patients. Hospital leadership received a monthly update of CPR status documentation rates. Results: Since project implementation, CPR status assessment rates have improved from 49% to 80% as of June 2017, and an additional 714 patients had a CPR status discussed and documented compared to June 2016. Formal system-wide expectations are being developed by the CPR assessment workgroup that all admitted patients should have CPR/Code status discussions and documentation upon admission. Conclusions: Standardization of CPR status assessment with formal training of clinicians and APPs has resulted in a significant increase in the number of CPR status assessments on the inpatient setting. A formal CPR status assessment expectations document is in the process of being developed among the workgroup. Formal trainings by palliative care specialists for APPs are ongoing. Future trainings are planned for physicians, housestaff and fellows.
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 35
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........2b7f498fd910f6f83934627c97f1d39e
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.31_suppl.147