Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Impact of Prosthesis–Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients

Objectives The authors sought to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and mid-term mortality in Asian patients with prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background Little information is available on PPM after TAVR in Asian patients. Methods The authors included 1,558 patients enrolled in the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention) Japanese multicenter registry from October 2013 to July 2016 after excluding patients who died following TAVR before discharge. PPM was defined as moderate if ≧0.65 but ≦0.85 cm2/m2, or severe if Results Of the 1,546 patients, moderate and severe PPM were observed in 138 (8.9%) and 11 (0.7%) patients, respectively. These 149 patients were included in the PPM group. The median age and body surface area were 85 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 81 to 88 years) and 1.41 m2 (IQR: 1.30 to 1.53 m2), respectively. In our multivariate analysis, younger age, larger body surface area, smaller aortic valve area, smaller annulus area, no balloon post-dilatation, and use of Edwards Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) were identified as independent predictors of PPM. The estimated cumulative all-cause mortality at 1 year using the Kaplan-Meier method was similar between the PPM and non-PPM groups (10.2% vs. 8.3%; log-rank; p = 0.41). Conclusions The low prevalence of PPM and mortality at 1 year in patients with PPM after TAVR in this Japanese cohort implies that PPM is not a risk factor for mid-term mortality in Asian patients who have undergone TAVR.