Back to Search Start Over

Utilizing the ZeroG TRiP Module During Inpatient Rehabilitation: Balance Recovery in Acute Stroke Patients – A Pilot Study

Authors :
Erica Cutler
Amanda Meyer
Matthew Nankin
Henry Hrdlicka
Jill Hellstrand
Emily Meise
Kaitlyn Rudolf
Source :
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 102:e31-e32
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Research Objectives To determine if inducing safe postural-perturbations with the TRiP-module during standing and ambulation exercises in the ZeroG body-weight support system, more effectively improves patient balance than ZeroG without these perturbations. Design Study was an unblinded randomized control pilot study. Setting Study was conducted at Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, a long-term acute care rehabilitation hospital located in Wallingford, Connecticut, USA. Participants Inpatient stroke rehabilitation patients were considered for the study if their Berg Balance Scale score was ≥ 21/56. Consented participants were randomly assigned to either the ZeroG or ZeroG+TRiP group. Interventions ZeroG interventions consisted of balance activities including ambulation, marching, side-stepping, retro-ambulation, step-taps, and step-ups. ZeroG+TRiP interventions included these same activities, with the addition of a sudden and brief assistive or resistive force in the lateral, anterior, or posterior direction. Participants completed eight-sessions over two-weeks, starting at TRiP level-one and progressing to level-ten based on the participant's progress and therapist's discretion. Main Outcome Measures The main study outcomes were the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) and Berg Balance Scale assessments. Results Institutional Berg Balance data from 2018 served as a historical Standard of Care (SOC) baseline. SOC, ZeroG, and ZeroG+TRiP groups displayed improved post-intervention Berg Balance scores (p≤0.0025), however, the post-intervention scores were not different between groups. Calculating the Berg Balance score percent change [mean(SD)n], the ZeroG+TRiP [66.95%(43.78%)14] and ZeroG groups [53.29%(24.13%)15] were significantly greater than the SOC group [28.31%(17.25%)30] (p≤0.0178), with no difference between the ZeroG groups (p=0.6669). The post intervention ABC assessment scores were similarly improved (p≤0.0438), with no difference between ZeroG groups. Conclusions Participants in both ZeroG groups demonstrated similar Berg Balance Scale and ABC score improvements, indicating the TRiP Module is not detrimental to post-acute stroke rehabilitation and can be safely used. This pilot-study then provides the rationale for conducting a larger study to better assess if the TRiP protocol provides an additional benefit to stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation. Author(s) Disclosures Aretech, LLC provided financial assistance for protected time to complete the administrative work associated with this pilot study. Authors have no other disclosures.

Details

ISSN :
00039993
Volume :
102
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........3203734c1fe52b7a4191047472c458f2