Cite
IP001. Totally Percutaneous Access Versus Open Femoral Cutdown for Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Targeted Vascular Database
MLA
Isabella J. Kuo, et al. “IP001. Totally Percutaneous Access Versus Open Femoral Cutdown for Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Targeted Vascular Database.” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 63, June 2016, p. 58S–59S. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.038.
APA
Isabella J. Kuo, Samuel L. Chen, Nii-Kabu Kabutey, Matthew D. Whealon, & Roy M. Fujitani. (2016). IP001. Totally Percutaneous Access Versus Open Femoral Cutdown for Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Targeted Vascular Database. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 63, 58S–59S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.038
Chicago
Isabella J. Kuo, Samuel L. Chen, Nii-Kabu Kabutey, Matthew D. Whealon, and Roy M. Fujitani. 2016. “IP001. Totally Percutaneous Access Versus Open Femoral Cutdown for Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Targeted Vascular Database.” Journal of Vascular Surgery 63 (June): 58S–59S. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.038.