Back to Search Start Over

Polarization transfer in theH2(e→,e′p→)nreaction up toQ2=1.61(GeV/c)2

Authors :
G. J. Kumbartzki
John C. Mitchell
J. J. LeRose
K. Wijesooriya
M. K. Jones
S. Dumalski
V. Gorbenko
D. Rowntree
C. E. Keppel
R. Michaels
X. Jiang
Andreas Klein
J. Hovebo
Oliver Keith Baker
M. Kuss
C. Glashausser
J. R. Calarco
L. Todor
J. A. Gomez
E. J. Brash
Larry Weinstein
William Bertozzi
F. Garibaldi
Nilanga Liyanage
Ronald Gilman
Pete Markowitz
G. J. Lolos
R. J. Woo
C. F. Perdrisat
J.-O. Hansen
Z. Papandreou
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski
R. Roche
M. Liang
Hartmuth Arenhövel
P. E. Ulmer
Rolf Ent
A. Kozlov
J. P. Chen
S. Strauch
G. M. Urciuoli
A. Cochran
S. Kuhn
Shalev Gilad
E. Chudakov
John M. Finn
C. W. de Jager
A. Saha
B. Hu
V. A. Punjabi
D. G. Meekins
S. Jeschonnek
Source :
Physical Review C. 73
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
American Physical Society (APS), 2006.

Abstract

The recoil proton polarization was measured in the {sup 2}H(e-vector,e{sup '}p-vector)n reaction in Hall A of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. The electron kinematics were centered on the quasielastic peak (x{sub Bj}{approx_equal}1) and included three values of the squared four-momentum transfer, Q{sup 2}=0.43,1.00 and 1.61 (GeV/c){sup 2}. For Q{sup 2}=0.43 and 1.61 (GeV/c){sup 2}, the missing momentum, p{sub m}, was centered at zero, whereas for Q{sup 2}=1.00 (GeV/c){sup 2} two values of p{sub m} were chosen: 0 and 174 MeV/c. At low p{sub m}, the Q{sup 2} dependence of the longitudinal polarization, P{sub z}{sup '}, is not well described by a state-of-the-art calculation. Further, at higher p{sub m}, a 3.5{sigma} discrepancy was observed in the transverse polarization, P{sub x}{sup '}. Understanding the origin of these discrepancies is important to confidently extract the neutron electric form factor from the analogous {sup 2}H(e-vector,e{sup '}n-vector)p experiment.

Details

ISSN :
1089490X and 05562813
Volume :
73
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physical Review C
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........45be78423326749dc3928d1fcc18ed5b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.73.064004