Back to Search Start Over

Diagnosis and management of von willebrand disease in Spain

Authors :
Jorge Cuesta
Carlos Aguilar
Nerea Castro Quismondo
Almudena Pérez-Rodríguez
Reyes Aguinaco
Javier García-Frade
Nira Navarro
Aurora de Andrés Jacob
Esther Lourés
Nuria Fernández-Mosteirín
Rosa Vidal
Maria Cristina Tenório
Pascual Marco
Javier Batlle
Karmele Arribalzaga
Emilia Fontanes
Rubén Berrueco
José Mateo
Santiago Bonanad
Ana María Rodríguez-Huerta
Rosa Campos
Ángeles Palomo
Víctor Jiménez-Yuste
Ana Moreto
Carmen Altisent
Nieves Alonso
Ángela Rodríguez-Trillo
Nuria Bermejo
María Paz Martínez
María Ferreiro
Ana Rosa Cid
Irene Corrales
Maria Eva Mingot-Castellano
Belén Iñigo
Faustino García-Candel
Andrés Moret
Sonia Herrero
Nina Borràs
María José Paloma
Francisco Vidal
N. Cabrera
Ramón Rodríguez-González
María del Mar Nieto
Rafael Parra
Shally Marcellini
Fernando Batlle López
Manuela Dobón
María Fernanda López-Fernández
Inmaculada Soto
Rocío Pérez-Montes
Source :
Annals of Blood. 3:5-5
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
AME Publishing Company, 2018.

Abstract

The correct diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is difficult because of the variability of its clinical expression and limitations of laboratory methods. However, correctly diagnosing VWD is important for therapy and genetic counselling. A survey related to the referred VWD patients in Spain revealed local diagnostic problems in at least one third of the cases of VWD. Consequently, a Spanish multicenter study was carried out in which a cohort of 556 patients from 330 families was analyzed centrally. VWD was confirmed in 480 patients. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of the whole coding von Willebrand factor gene ( VWF ) was carried out in all recruited patients, compared with the phenotype, and a final diagnosis was established. A total of 238 different VWF mutations were found: 154 were not included in the Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD). Of the patients, 467 were found to have a VWF mutation/s. A good phenotype/genotype association was estimated in 94.6% of the cases. One hundred and eighty patients had two or more mutations. Occasionally a predominant phenotype masked the presence of a second abnormality. One hundred and sixteen patients presented with mutations that had previously been associated with an increased VWF clearance. Ristocetin induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) unavailability, central phenotypic results disagreement and difficult distinction between severe type 1 and type 3 VWD prevented a clear diagnosis in 74 patients. A local/central disagreement over diagnosis occurred in 42.3% of the whole cohort. The NGS study facilitated an appropriate classification in 60 of them. Based on these results, a proposal for a change in the VWD diagnostic paradigm, suggesting the inclusion of the analysis of VWF at the initial diagnostic process, has been made. An extension of this project to include 400 new VWD patients has begun. A diagnostic strategy has been developed, and a Spanish consensus guideline for optimal treatment of VWD was developed in Spain. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice in responsive VWD patients. VWF concentrates (VWF/FVIII) are used in individuals unresponsive to DDAVP, when DDAVP is contraindicated, or in VWD types 2B and 3, and for long term management needs (e.g., post major surgery).

Details

ISSN :
2521361X
Volume :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Blood
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........46af54dfe111f247af82d7c57d35cb30
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/aob.2017.12.08