A cost-benefit analysis to select the most effective method for positional cloning: genotyping by sequencing versus allele-specific PCR

Next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled the rapid generation of high-resolution genetic maps to enable the identification of genomic regions associated with traits of interest. In certain cases these regions of interest need to be narrowed down via fine mapping to increase resolution to the level of the individual gene. In those cases, there is a choice of genotyping options, whereby cost, time, and information content need to be considered. We developed detailed, customizable models to compare the cost of genotyping by sequencing and allele-specific PCR for fine-mapping genomic regions of interest. The models were validated experimentally with data from a fine-mapping experiment designed to identify candidate genes within a 3.2-Mb disease resistance locus in the cereal crop sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.). Moench), which has a sequenced genome. The size of the mapping population, genetic diversity of the parental lines, choice of reagents, and labor cost were shown to influence the overall cost of the two methods, and, consequently, which method would be most cost-effective for a given experiment. The model can be easily customized to reflect experiments with different species, genetic populations, experimental and personnel costs to determine the most cost-effective procedure for a new positional cloning project.