Back to Search Start Over

The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change

Authors :
Heidi L Rehm
Joseph T Alaimo
Swaroop Aradhya
Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir
Hunter Best
Rhonda Brandon
Jillian G Buchan
Elizabeth C Chao
Elaine Chen
Jacob Clifford
Ana S Cohen
Laura K Conlin
Soma Das
Kyle W Davis
Daniela del Gaudio
Florencia Del Viso
Christina DiVincenzo
Marcia Eisenberg
Lucia Guidugli
Monia B Hammer
Steven M Harrison
Kathryn E Hatchell
Lindsay Havens Dyer
Lily U Hoang
James M Holt
Vaidehi Jobanputra
Izabela D Karbassi
Hutton M Kearney
Melissa A Kelly
Jacob M Kelly
Michelle L Kluge
Timothy Komala
Paul Kruszka
Lynette Lau
Matthew S Lebo
Christian R Marshall
Dianalee McKnight
Kirsty McWalter
Yan Meng
Narasimhan Nagan
Christian S Neckelmann
Nir Neerman
Zhiyv Niu
Vitoria K Paolillo
Sarah A Paolucci
Denise Perry
Tina Pesaran
Kelly Radtke
Kristen J Rasmussen
Kyle Retterer
Carol J Saunders
Elizabeth Spiteri
Christine M Stanley
Anna Szuto
Ryan J Taft
Isabelle Thiffault
Brittany C Thomas
Amanda Thomas-Wilson
Erin Thorpe
Timothy J Tidwell
Meghan C Towne
Hana Zouk
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2022.

Abstract

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a common result of diagnostic genetic testing and can be difficult to manage with potential misinterpretation and downstream costs, including time investment by clinicians. We investigated the rate of VUS reported on diagnostic testing via multi-gene panels (MGPs) and exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) to measure the magnitude of uncertain results and explore ways to reduce their potentially detrimental impact. We collected data from over 1.5 million genetic tests from 19 clinical laboratories across the United States and Canada from during 2020-2021. We found a lower rate of inconclusive results due to VUS on ES/GS tests compared to MGPs (22.5% vs. 32.6%; p

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........5d80f0f4b92e956df2d629d73bc45bef