Individual human habit in the conditions of local self-government: the role of individual socialization and individual legal socialization in its formation and development

The article is devoted to the study of the role of individual socialization and individual legal socialization in the formation anddevelopment of individual human habit in the conditions of local self-government.The author tries to prove that individual socialization and individual legal socialization play a fundamental role in the formationand development of individual human habit in terms of local self-government – that is, at the local level of society (spatial criterion) inthe territorial community (territorial community). in the conditions of everyday life (class criterion) where the human life cycle is actuallyrealized.It is proved that in the process of individual and, in general, collective socialization, their important parametric features are mani -fested, which concern: a) the social space where they take place; b) places where they occur; c) organizational and organizational andlegal conditions under which they occur; c) the state in which socialization processes take place; d) the functional for which the aboveprocesses of socialization take place; e) the basic foundations on which the above processes of socialization; f) the boundaries of thesystem of power, where the above processes of socialization; g) the circle of immanent partners of public power in the above processesof socialization; h) the final result of the above processes of socialization.It is argued that the consideration of the phenomenologies of general socialization and legal socialization in different qualitativestates and in the contextualization of the formation of human habit, allows us to assert the existence of a stable logical sequential systemicconnection between them.The author’s systematic analysis of the phenomenologies of general socialization and legal socialization in the contextualization andformation of human habit allows to build a procedural chain that clearly reflects the relationship of these phenomena with the conditionsof their formation and implementation – so, in his opinion, such a chain can be reflected : “Man” – “territorial community” – “local selfgovernment”– “state of everyday life” – “general individual (group, collective) socialization” – “legal socialization” – “human habit”.