Back to Search Start Over

Harbingers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer: Precision Oncology Case Studies

Authors :
Himisha Beltran
Anuradha Gopalan
Dan R. Robinson
Mark A. Rubin
Andrea Sboner
Brian D. Robinson
Tarcisio Fedrizzi
Joanna Cyrta
Francesca Demichelis
Antonio Rodriguez
Juan Miguel Mosquera
Arshi Arora
Scott A. Tomlins
Daniel H. Hovelson
Ronglai Shen
Davide Prandi
Lawrence D. True
Peter S. Nelson
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2021.

Abstract

Primary prostate cancer (PCa) can show marked molecular heterogeneity. However, systematic analyses comparing primary PCa and matched metastases in individual patients are lacking. We aimed to address the molecular aspects of metastatic progression while accounting for heterogeneity of primary PCa.In this pilot study, we collected 12 radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens from men who subsequently developed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We used histomorphology (Gleason grade, focus size, stage) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (ERG and p53) to identify independent tumors and/or distinct subclones of primary PCa. We then compared molecular profiles of these primary PCa areas to matched metastatic samples using whole exome sequencing (WES) and amplicon-based DNA and RNA sequencing. Based on combined pathology and molecular analysis, seven (58%) RP specimens harbored monoclonal and topographically continuous disease, albeit with some degree of intra-tumor heterogeneity; four (33%) specimens showed true multifocal disease; and one displayed monoclonal disease with discontinuous topography. Early (truncal) events in primary PCa included SPOP p.F133V (one patient), BRAF p.K601E (one patient), and TMPRSS2:ETS rearrangements (nine patients). Activating AR alterations were seen in eight (67%) mCRPC patients, but not in matched primary PCa. Hotspot TP53 mutations, found in metastases from three patients, were readily present in matched primary disease. Alterations in genes encoding epigenetic modifiers were observed in several patients (either shared between primary foci and metastases or in metastatic samples only).WES-based phylogenetic reconstruction and/or clonality scores were consistent with the index focus designated by pathology review in six out of nine (67%) cases. The three instances of discordance pertained to monoclonal, topographically continuous tumors, which would have been considered as unique disease in routine practice.Overall, our results emphasize pathologic and molecular heterogeneity of primary PCa, and suggest that comprehensive IHC-assisted pathology review and genomic analysis are highly concordant in nominating the “index” primary PCa area.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........6cddb88d759b1263ba5e9b764d448235
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.30.468210