Back to Search Start Over

Polymyxin B resistance rates in carbapenem‑resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and a comparison between Etest® and broth microdilution methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Authors :
Jie Xu
Yalu Ren
Qiongfang Zhu
Lina Zhao
Xu Chen
Source :
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 20:762-769
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Spandidos Publications, 2020.

Abstract

Polymyxin B has been considered to be the last line of defense for life-threatening infections caused by multiple drug resistant gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The present study analyzed CRPA resistance to polymyxin B in the Suzhou district of China. Additionally, polymyxin B resistance rates were compared in different parts of the world to determine global trends. The present study also assessed the reliability and effectiveness of the Etest® in a clinical setting, as laboratories lack a reliable and efficient susceptibility test for polymyxin B. The susceptibility rate of polymyxin B reached 96.0%, which is in accordance with results obtained from the United States of America, Europe, Africa and the majority of Asian countries. However, the rate of polymyxin B non-susceptibility (resistant or intermediate) in Singapore is 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.93). In addition, the susceptibility rate of polymyxin B determined via Etest® was not significantly increased compared with that determined via broth microdilution (98.0 vs. 96.0%; P=0.558). Essential and categorical agreement rates reached 98.0%. In conclusion, the polymyxin B resistance rate of CRPA isolates is relatively low in the majority of countries, with the exception of Singapore. Furthermore, Etest® may be a reliable clinical method for the measurement of polymyxin B resistance in CRPA isolates.

Details

ISSN :
17921015 and 17920981
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........70aa78ad0d9ba9404f2c88d8b93b8597
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8777