Back to Search
Start Over
Successes with and barriers to patient-reported outcome deployment at a comprehensive cancer center
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology. 36:292-292
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018.
-
Abstract
- 292 Background: Routine collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) reduces hospitalizations and improves quality of life. In the absence of clear implementation guidelines and research guiding deployment, PROs may not have the desired impact on outcomes in routine oncology practice. We share lessons learned from PRO deployment at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Methods: We developed a symptom/toxicity assessment tool based on the PRO-CTCAE to capture 15 symptomatic adverse events with a 1-week recall: fatigue/ decreased appetite/insomnia/ shortness of breath/numbness and tingling/concentration, general pain/anxiety/sadness, rash, nausea/vomiting/fever, constipation, and diarrhea. Responses from eligible English-literate patients scheduled for a gastrointestinal cancer center or adult palliative care visit between January 18 to March 22, 2018 were transmitted directly from clinic tablet to the EMR. To evaluate the deployment, we sought qualitative feedback from clinic staff and three multidisciplinary working groups comprised of patients, nurses, pharmacists, operations leaders, quality/safety experts, and health services researchers to identify technical and workflow gaps in PRO Content, Implementation, and Analytics. Results: We noted a 38% response rate of the N = 4440 PROs assigned to N = 4440 scheduled visits for N = 2055 unique patients (36% were completed, 2% started but not completed); 62% were not started. Workflow enhancement requests include an updated summary view, a clinical documentation tool, a scoring algorithm to highlight severe responses, and a quality metric dashboard to evaluate the deployment. Ongoing analyses are studying the proportion of moderate-severe symptomatic adverse events reported and their association with provider action (i.e., supportive care referral, chemotherapy treatment plan modification, or unplanned ED/hospitalization in the subsequent 30 days). Conclusions: Refinement of the PRO deployment strategy is needed to guide implementation efforts and demonstrate meaningful impact in routine oncology practice.
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 36
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........7880f10025484c757ed84b824ef7f17c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.30_suppl.292