Back to Search
Start Over
Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management Fosters Management-Science Partnerships
- Source :
- Rangeland Ecology & Management. 71:646-657
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Rangelands of the western Great Plains of North America are complex social-ecological systems where management objectives for livestock production, grassland bird conservation, and vegetation structure and composition converge. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) experiment is a 10-year collaborative adaptive management (CAM) project initiated in 2012 that is aimed at fostering science-management partnerships and data-driven rangeland management through a participatory, multistakeholder approach. This study evaluates the decision-making process that emerged from the first 4 yr of CARM. Our objectives were to 1) document how diverse stakeholder experiences, epistemologies, and resulting knowledge contributed to the CARM project, 2) evaluate how coproduced knowledge informed management decision making through three grazing seasons, and 3) explore the implications of participation in the CARM project for rangeland stakeholders. We evaluated management decision making as representatives from government agencies and conservation nongovernmental organizations, ranchers, and interdisciplinary researchers worked within the CARM experiment to 1) prioritize desired ecosystem services; 2) determine objectives; 3) set stocking rates, criteria for livestock movement among pastures, and vegetation treatments; and 4) select monitoring techniques that would inform decision making. For this paper, we analyzed meeting transcripts, interviews, and focus group data related to stakeholder group decision making. We find two key lessons from the CARM project. First, the CAM process makes visible, but does not reconcile differences between, stakeholder experiences and ways of knowing about complex rangeland systems. Second, social learning in CAM is contingent on the development of trust among stakeholder and researcher groups. We suggest future CAM efforts should 1) make direct efforts to share and acknowledge managers’ different rangeland management experiences, epistemologies, and knowledge and 2) involve long-term research commitment in time and funding to social, as well as experimental, processes that promote trust building among stakeholders and researchers over time.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
Government
Ecology
business.industry
Environmental resource management
Stakeholder
010501 environmental sciences
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Social learning
01 natural sciences
Focus group
Ecosystem services
010601 ecology
Adaptive management
Rangeland management
Animal Science and Zoology
Business
Management by objectives
Environmental planning
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15507424
- Volume :
- 71
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Rangeland Ecology & Management
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........7b3172d8730cd9db493d45744444a29b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.008