Back to Search
Start Over
Is Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) Technology More Profitable than Conventional Method for Sugarcane Production? — An Economic Analysis§
- Source :
- Agricultural Economics Research Review. 29:117
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Diva Enterprises Private Limited, 2016.
-
Abstract
- The study has examined profitability, sources of productivity improvement and determinants of a new technology-Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) —adoption in sugarcane cultivation in Tamil Nadu by collecting primary data from 120 sugarcane farms during 2014–15. Although the cost of cultivation has been found higher in SSI method vis-a-vis conventional method, the cost of production is lower due to 26 per cent more cane yield. The cost and return analysis has indicated that sugarcane cultivation is more profitable under SSI method than under the conventional method. The decomposition analysis has shown that the inputs, viz. fertilizers, micro-nutrients and deployment of labour are the major sources of productivity enhancement in the SSI method. The estimates of logit model have indicated that farmers’ educational level and experience are the major determinants for adoption of SSI method in sugarcane cultivation. The major policy options suggested to improve production and profitability of sugarcane include provision of drip irrigation with subsidy, ensuring timely availability of critical inputs and imparting periodical trainings to farmers on SSI method such as fertigation, wide row spacing, etc.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
Fertigation
biology
business.industry
Applied Mathematics
Subsidy
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Drip irrigation
biology.organism_classification
01 natural sciences
Biotechnology
Agricultural science
Agriculture
040103 agronomy & agriculture
0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries
Production (economics)
Profitability index
Cane
business
Productivity
010606 plant biology & botany
Mathematics
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 09740279 and 09713441
- Volume :
- 29
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Agricultural Economics Research Review
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........7cbf0a869638968510d7c52e060787be
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2016.00024.0