Back to Search Start Over

Cotton Irrigation Timing with Variable Seasonal Irrigation Capacities in the Texas South Plains

Authors :
James P. Bordovsky
Joseph T Mustian
Katie L. Lewis
Glen L. Ritchie
Source :
Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 31:883-897
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE), 2015.

Abstract

Within the Ogallala Aquifer Region of Texas, the irrigation capacity (IC) for a given field often changes within a growing season due to seasonal depletion of the aquifer, in-season changes in crop irrigation needs in dry years, or consequences of irrigation volume limits imposed by irrigation district rules. Irrigation planning is further complicated by erratic seasonal rainfall. A field experiment was conducted from 2010 to 2013 to determine cotton ( L.) irrigation productivity using a range of ICs common to the Texas South Plains during three irrigation periods. The treatments included in-season ICs (maximums of 0, 3.2, and 6.4 mm d-1) in combination with irrigation periods determined by accumulated growing degree days (GDD15.6) and were designated as period 1 (P1= emergence to 525 GDD15.6), period 2 (P2= 525 to 750 GDD15.6), and period 3 (P3>750 GDD15.6). Combinations of these factor levels resulted in 27 irrigation treatments with applications made by the low energy precision application (LEPA) method. Annual rainfall totals ranged from 137 to 557 mm over the four years. In all years, results indicated that attempting to store water in the soil profile, or irrigating in excess of the cotton evapotranspiration rate, early in the growing season reduced seasonal irrigation water use efficiency (SIWUE), and sometimes yield, compared to treatments with limited or no early irrigations. Treatments with 0 and 3.2 mm d-1 ICs during P1 used up to 20% less seasonal irrigation with minor yield loss (

Details

ISSN :
19437838 and 08838542
Volume :
31
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Applied Engineering in Agriculture
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........804c2f7576509268860fc1129f3ea626
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.31.10953