Back to Search
Start Over
Superiority of Somatostatin Analog in Comparison With Drugs for Treating Pancreatic Fistula in Rats
- Source :
- International Surgery. 107:15-22
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- International College of Surgeons, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Objective This study aims to identify the most effective individual drug in an established triple-drug therapy (TDT) using a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rat model. Summary of background data POPF is the major complication of pancreatectomy that causes intraperitoneal abscess, sepsis, and pseudoaneurysm rupture, all of which may prolong hospital stays and cause potentially serious events or death. We previously demonstrated that TDT with a somatostatin analog, gabexate mesilate, and imipenem/cilastatin effectively prevents POPF, especially in high-risk patients. Methods POPF-induced rats were killed on postoperative day 3 after control (C), gabexate mesilate (G), imipenem/cilastatin (I), and somatostatin analog (S) treatments. Levels of serum amylase and lipase, or ascitic amylase and lipase were measured. Intraperitoneal adhesion between the abdominal wall and pancreas and pancreatic inflammation were evaluated. Results Serum amylase levels did not significantly differ among the groups. Serum lipase level was significantly higher in group I than in the other groups (P < 0.01). Both ascitic amylase and lipase levels were significantly lower in group S than in the other groups (P < 0.01). Median inflammation scores were significantly lower in groups G, I, and S than in group C (P < 0.01). Moreover, adhesion score was lower in group S than in the other groups (groups C, G, I, and S with scores 3, 2, 3, and 1, respectively, P < 0.01). Conclusion Among the 3 drugs, the somatostatin analog was the most effective against POPF.
Details
- ISSN :
- 25202456 and 00208868
- Volume :
- 107
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........84e5e93c0231db98634d271e67507808
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-18-00040.1