Depth Cues Changes Circle Size Judgment Measured by Psychophysical Scaling

The aim of our study was to investigate whether different circle sizes, in conditions of pure size judgment and in a simple contextual judgment with an interfering depth suggesting background, produce different size perceptions. We used the magnitude estimation to obtain the apparent size of circles under two different experimental conditions: with a neutral black background and with a convergent gradient to generate an artificial horizon to evoke depth cues. Twenty-two subjects with normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity (mean age = 21.3 yrs; SD = 1.6) were tested. The procedure consisted of two gray circles at luminance of 40 cd/m2, separated 10 degrees of visual angle apart from each other. On the left side was always present the reference circle (visual angle of 1.1 degree) in which was assigned an arbitrary value of 50 was assigned. The subjects' task was to judge the size of the circles appearing in the right side of the monitor screen assigning a number proportional to the perceived altered size, relative to the reference circle. Seven different sizes (0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 degrees) were presented in each condition. Our results have shown a high correlation for circle size and depth conditions (R = 0.987 and R = 0.997) between the logs of the stimuli and the subjective magnitude estimated values. The exponents obtained by the Power Law were 0.79 and 1.09, respectively to each condition. Additionally, a gender effect was observed in which males had showed an expansive perception of size with no dependence on the background. We concluded that in the induced depth condition, the perception of the circle sizes were judged subjectively closer to their respective physical size than in the condition of free visual cues. Our data reinforces the integrative manner of perceptual system when working with the sensory information