Back to Search Start Over

Dose Escalated Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With Short-Term Androgen Suppression for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0815 Randomized Trial

Authors :
Mohamed A. Elshaikh
Benjamin Movsas
Fabio Cury
J.M. Michalski
V.S. Kavadi
Theodore Karrison
Bruce Hershatter
Alvaro Martinez
Deborah Citrin
Michael Lock
G. Morton
Deborah Watkins Bruner
Jason A. Efstathiou
H.M. Sandler
Adam Raben
Adam Currey
Daniel J. Krauss
Di Yan
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 111:S1
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s) Androgen suppression can improve outcomes when added to radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate risk prostate cancer, but no study to date has reported its utility in the context of contemporary, dose-escalated RT. Herein, the clinical outcomes of a phase III prospective trial evaluating the utility of total androgen suppression (TAS) combined with dose-escalated RT for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer are reported. Materials/Methods Eligible patients had intermediate risk prostate cancer defined as harboring ≥ 1 of the following risk factors: clinical stage T2b-T2c, Gleason score 7, or PSA value > 10 and ≤ 20 ng/mL. Patients with all three risk factors and ≥ 50% of biopsy cores positive were ineligible. After stratification by number of intermediate risk factors (single vs. multiple), RT boost modality, and baseline comorbidity (ACE-27 comorbidity index ≥ vs. Results The study completed its accrual objective. Between 2009 and 2016, 1538 patients were randomized. There were 750 eligible patients on Arm 1 and 742 on Arm 2 comprising the modified intent-to-treat population. 67% had a single intermediate risk factor. 88% were treated with EBRT with the remainder receiving EBRT plus brachytherapy boost. 33% had an ACE-27 score ≥ grade 2. With a median follow up of 6.2 years, 219 deaths occurred, 119 in Arm 1 and 100 in Arm 2, yielding 5-year overall survival estimates of 90% vs. 91%, respectively [HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.65-1.11); P = 0.22]. 193 patients experienced PSA failure, 125 in Arm 1 and 68 in Arm 2 [HR 0.52 (0.39-0.70); P Conclusion While the addition of TAS to dose-escalated RT did not improve overall survival for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer, significant improvements in rates of metastases, deaths due to prostate cancer, and PSA failures support the continued use of combination dose-escalated RT and TAS. Benefits will need to be weighed against the increased risk of adverse events and the patient reported outcomes analysis.

Details

ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
111
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........8ba3d5bcc3e992426a765b393aceb713
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.039