Intensity of end-of life-care in children with cancer: A population-based study

10574 Background: There is growing evidence that adult oncology patients who know they are dying choose less intense care. Further, high intensity care is associated with worse caregiver outcomes. Little is known about pediatric oncology end-of-life care intensity. Methods: Using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development administrative database linked to death certificates, we performed a retrospective population based analysis of cancer patients aged 0-21 who died between 2000 and 2011. The frequency of previously defined end-of-life intensity markers (hospital death, intense medical interventions, IV chemotherapy, and gastrostomy and tracheostomy tube placement) were calculated and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with > 2 intensity markers (as above), intense medical intervention (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, ICU admission, or hemodialysis), and hospital death. Results: The 3,732 pediatric cancer decedents were 34% non-Hispanic whites and 45% Hispanic; 41% had hematologic malignancies and 59% solid tumors. The most prevalent intensity markers included: hospital death (63%) and ICU admission (20%). 65% had > 1 intensity marker, 23% > 2, and 22% > 1 intense medical intervention. There was a bimodal association between age and intensity: the youngest patients (age < 5) and adolescent patients (age 15-21) were more likely to receive intense care: < 5y (intense medical intervention: OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; hospital death: OR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2; > 2 markers: OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.1-1.8); 15-21y (intense medical: OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9; hospital death: OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7; > 2 markers: OR = 1.35, 1.1-1.7) (references: 5-9y). Other factors associated with intensity included, hematologic malignancies, minority status, and death between 2008 and 2011 vs. < 2008. Conclusions: Nearly two-thirds of the pediatric cancer decedents had ≥1 marker of intense care and disparities exist. Patients < 5 and adolescents were more likely to receive intense end-of-life care. Further research needs to determine if these rates and variation are consistent with patient goals and factors associated with goal concurrent care.