Back to Search Start Over

Digital Pathology During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy: Survey Study (Preprint)

Authors :
Simone Giaretto
Salvatore Lorenzo Renne
Daoud Rahal
Paola Bossi
Piergiuseppe Colombo
Paola Spaggiari
Sofia Manara
Mauro Sollai
Barbara Fiamengo
Tatiana Brambilla
Bethania Fernandes
Stefania Rao
Abubaker Elamin
Marina Valeri
Camilla De Carlo
Vincenzo Belsito
Cesare Lancellotti
Miriam Cieri
Angelo Cagini
Luigi Terracciano
Massimo Roncalli
Luca Di Tommaso
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
JMIR Publications Inc., 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Transition to digital pathology usually takes months or years to be completed. We were familiarizing ourselves with digital pathology solutions at the time when the COVID-19 outbreak forced us to embark on an abrupt transition to digital pathology. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to quantitatively describe how the abrupt transition to digital pathology might affect the quality of diagnoses, model possible causes by probabilistic modeling, and qualitatively gauge the perception of this abrupt transition. METHODS A total of 17 pathologists and residents participated in this study; these participants reviewed 25 additional test cases from the archives and completed a final psychologic survey. For each case, participants performed several different diagnostic tasks, and their results were recorded and compared with the original diagnoses performed using the gold standard method (ie, conventional microscopy). We performed Bayesian data analysis with probabilistic modeling. RESULTS The overall analysis, comprising 1345 different items, resulted in a 9% (117/1345) error rate in using digital slides. The task of differentiating a neoplastic process from a nonneoplastic one accounted for an error rate of 10.7% (42/392), whereas the distinction of a malignant process from a benign one accounted for an error rate of 4.2% (11/258). Apart from residents, senior pathologists generated most discrepancies (7.9%, 13/164). Our model showed that these differences among career levels persisted even after adjusting for other factors. CONCLUSIONS Our findings are in line with previous findings, emphasizing that the duration of transition (ie, lengthy or abrupt) might not influence the diagnostic performance. Moreover, our findings highlight that senior pathologists may be limited by a digital gap, which may negatively affect their performance with digital pathology. These results can guide the process of digital transition in the field of pathology.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........9a044be3528af9a0d6555d20d78e87a5