Back to Search Start Over

A Predictive Scoring System Based on Inflammatory and Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Resection

Authors :
Pei-Hua Zhang
Qian-Qian Guo
Yan-Ru Qin
Jian Wu
Li-Wen Feng
Li-Feng Liang
Jiang Li
Jing Li
Source :
Cancer Management and Research. 12:3937-3948
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose Inflammation is closely associated with prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to assess the predictive value of existing inflammatory and tumor markers in GC, to establish a systemic score based on valuable predictors for early risk stratification of patients, and to create a nomogram for individual risk prediction. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 401 GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy from 2007 to 2016. Results Through univariate and multivariate survival analysis, age (>60 years), depth of invasion (pT3-4), lymph node invasion (pN1-3), histologic classification (poor), adjuvant chemotherapy (no), albumin fibrinogen ratio (AFR) ( 27 U/mL) independently indicated inferior disease-free survival (DFS). In addition, depth of invasion, lymph node invasion, histologic classification, adjuvant chemotherapy, AFR, and CA19-9 were incorporated in the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS). A combined AFR and CA19-9 prognostic score (CACPS) was established. Lower AFR ( 27 U/mL) were allocated 1 point each in the CACPS (range, 0-2). CACPS can be used as an independent predictor for DFS and CSS in multivariate analysis (for DFS: CACPS 1: HR=2.039, 95% CI: 1.357-3.065, P=0.001; CACPS 2: HR=2.419, 95% CI: 1.397-4.186, P=0.002; for CSS: CACPS 1: HR=2.035, 95% CI: 1.292-3.205, P=0.002; CACPS 2: HR=2.255, 95% CI: 1.252-4.059, P=0.007), with a higher CACPS indicating poor survival according to Kaplan-Meier curves (both P

Details

ISSN :
11791322
Volume :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer Management and Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........9cd1a0e4b12a99bcce9695d85322b044
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s250408