Back to Search
Start Over
Shifting power, preventive logic, and the response of the target: Germany, Russia, and the First World War
- Source :
- Journal of Strategic Studies. 40:731-769
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Informa UK Limited, 2016.
-
Abstract
- If a declining state has incentives for preventive war, the rising state should have incentives to delay a confrontation until it is stronger. We develop the theoretical paradox and examine the July 1914 crisis. Why did Russia, rising relative to Germany, not adopt a buying-time strategy? We argue that although most Russian leaders hoped to avoid a confrontation, they feared that the failure to support Serbia would lead to a loss of Russian credibility and a significant setback to Russia’s position in the Balkans, one that could not easily be reversed, even with Russia’s expected increase in relative military power.
- Subjects :
- 021110 strategic, defence & security studies
Sociology and Political Science
media_common.quotation_subject
05 social sciences
0211 other engineering and technologies
02 engineering and technology
Preventive war
0506 political science
Setback
Power (social and political)
Incentive
State (polity)
July Crisis
Political economy
Political science
Political Science and International Relations
Credibility
Development economics
050602 political science & public administration
Position (finance)
media_common
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1743937X and 01402390
- Volume :
- 40
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Strategic Studies
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........a331b7c3dd3636bd5be12bcc05d7aeb1
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1242421