Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of Iodophor vs Chlorhexidine Solutions for Surgical Site Infections and Unplanned Reoperations for Patients Who Underwent Fracture Repair

Authors :
Jean-Claude G. D’Alleyrand
Jessica C. Rivera
Uyen Nguyen
Olivia Paige Szasz
Gregory J. Della Rocca
Franca Mossuto
Max Talbot
Jana Palmer
I. Leah Gitajn
Haley Demyanovich
Lehana Thabane
Joshua Rudnicki
Frances Grissom
Megan Camara
Robert Zura
Nathan N O'Hara
Shannon Dodds
David Pogorzelski
Taryn Scott
Mohit Bhandari
Sheila Sprague
Diane Heels-Ansdell
Bradley Petrisor
Alisha Garibaldi
Gerard P. Slobogean
Daniel C. Mullins
Amber Wood
Jeffrey Wells
Joan N. Hebden
Lucas S. Marchand
Stephanie L. Tanner
Robert V O'Toole
Lyndsay M. O’Hara
Gordon H. Guyatt
P. J. Devereaux
Andrea Howe
Manjari Joshi
Alejandra Rojas
Silvia Li
Jeff Friedrich
Kyle J. Jeray
Debra Marvel
Anthony D. Harris
Paula McKay
Justin Fowler
Saam Morshed
Gina Del Fabbro
Source :
JAMA Network Open. 3:e202215
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Medical Association (AMA), 2020.

Abstract

Importance The risk of developing a surgical site infection after extremity fracture repair is nearly 5 times greater than in most elective orthopedic surgical procedures. For all surgical procedures, it is standard practice to prepare the operative site with an antiseptic solution; however, there is limited evidence to guide the choice of solution used for orthopedic fracture repair. Objective To compare the effectiveness of iodophor vs chlorhexidine solutions to reduce surgical site infections and unplanned fracture-related reoperations for patients who underwent fracture repair. Design, Setting, and Participants The PREP-IT (Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma) master protocol will be followed to conduct 2 multicenter pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trials, Aqueous-PREP (Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Aqueous Antiseptic Skin Solution in Open Fractures) and PREPARE (Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Alcohol Skin Solutions in Fractured Extremities). The Aqueous-PREP trial will compare 4% aqueous chlorhexidine vs 10% povidone-iodine for patients with open extremity fractures. The PREPARE trial will compare 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol vs 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol for patients with open extremity fractures and patients with closed lower extremity or pelvic fractures. Both trials will share key aspects of study design and trial infrastructure. The studies will follow a pragmatic cluster randomized crossover design with alternating treatment periods of approximately 2 months. The primary outcome will be surgical site infection and the secondary outcome will be unplanned fracture-related reoperations within 12 months. The Aqueous-PREP trial will enroll a minimum of 1540 patients with open extremity fractures from at least 12 hospitals; PREPARE will enroll a minimum of 1540 patients with open extremity fractures and 6280 patients with closed lower extremity and pelvic fractures from at least 18 hospitals. The primary analyses will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle and account for potential between-cluster and between-period variability. The patient-centered design, implementation, and dissemination of results are guided by a multidisciplinary team that includes 3 patients and other relevant stakeholders. Discussion The PREP-IT master protocol increases efficiency through shared trial infrastructure and study design components. Because prophylactic skin antisepsis is used prior to all surgical procedures and the application, cost, and availability of all study solutions are similar, the results of the PREP-IT trials are poised to inform clinical guidelines and bring about an immediate change in clinical practice. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers:NCT03385304andNCT03523962

Details

ISSN :
25743805
Volume :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JAMA Network Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........a88f5a0e151b24622c78d48743e8f312
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2215