Back to Search Start Over

Data from ProDiet: A Phase II Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Green Tea Catechins and Lycopene in Men at Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer

Authors :
Chris Metcalfe
Richard M. Martin
Eleanor Walsh
David E. Neal
Hilary Moody
Rhiannon Macefield
Jeff Holly
David Gillatt
Freddie C. Hamdy
Liz Down
Jenny L. Donovan
George Davey Smith
Alan Crozier
Gema P. Caro
Marie Cantwell
Jeremy Horwood
Kerry N.L. Avery
Vanessa Er
J. Athene Lane
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies suggest that diet can alter prostate cancer risk. This study aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of dietary modification in men at increased risk of prostate cancer. Men were invited with a PSA level of 2.0–2.95 ng/mL or 3.0–19.95 ng/mL with negative prostate biopsies. Randomization (3 × 3 factorial design) to daily green tea and lycopene: green tea drink (3 cups, unblinded) or capsules [blinded, 600 mg flavan-3-ol ()-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) or placebo] and lycopene-rich foods (unblinded) or capsules (blinded, 15 mg lycopene or placebo) for 6 months. Primary endpoints were randomization rates and intervention adherence (blinded assessment of metabolites) at 6 months with secondary endpoints of acceptability (from interviews), safety, weight, blood pressure, and PSA. A total of 133 of 469 (28.4%) men approached agreed to be randomized and 132 were followed-up (99.2%). Mean lycopene was 1.28 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.09–1.50, P = 0.003] times higher in the lycopene capsule group and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.21–1.66; P < 0.001) times higher in the lycopene-enriched diet group compared with placebo capsules. Median EGCG was 10.7 nmol/L (95% CI, 7.0–32.0) higher in in the active capsule group and 20.0 nmol/L (95% CI, 0.0–19.0) higher in the green tea drink group compared with placebo capsules (both P < 0.001). All interventions were acceptable and well tolerated although men preferred the capsules. Dietary prevention is acceptable to men at risk of prostate cancer. This intervention trial demonstrates that a chemoprevention clinical trial is feasible. Cancer Prev Res; 11(11); 687–96. ©2018 AACR.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........ab9d996260ae9a7f4b8199cd872964f5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.c.6547307.v1