Back to Search Start Over

Percutaneous Retrieval of an Amplatzer Septal Occluder Device that had migrated to the Aortic Arch

Authors :
B. Selby
Renan Uflacker
Marcelo Guimaraes
Cole E. Denton
Claudio Schönholz
Christopher Hannegan
Source :
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 35:430-433
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2011.

Abstract

The secundum type atrial septal defect (ASD) is a relatively common finding in the general population, occurring at a reported rate of 3.78 per 100,000 live births [1], and comprising approximately 6–10% of all congenital cardiac defects [2]. When faced with a symptomatic ASD, there are several methods of treatment available. Open surgery with occlusion of the ASD is the time-honored treatment [3], but percutaneous placement of an occluder device has been the preferred treatment for several years [4]. The choice for the closure method is mainly based on the severity of symptoms, the underlying medical condition, cardiovascular anatomy [5, 6], and the size of the septal defect [7]. Surgical repair has been practiced for more than 50 years and often is preferred when the ASD size is larger and the symptoms are more severe [3]. However, percutaneous occluder device placement has largely replaced surgery when the patient is incapable of withstanding a major procedure, when the septal defect is\24 mm [8], and when the septal defect is not located near other vital cardiovascular structures [6]. The Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) device has been extensively studied for the percutaneous closure of both ventricular as well as atrial septal defects [9, 10]. Using the approach first described in 1976 by King and Mills [4], the Amplatzer device can be placed via a venous route, and may be secured without placing the patient under general anesthesia or using cardiopulmonary bypass. Although percutaneous device placement has been found to have a lower rate of overall complications than surgical closure [5], there have been several reports of adverse events in the literature [5, 6, 8]. The case presented here describes a complication that has not yet been reported, related to the migration of the device to the aortic arch.

Details

ISSN :
1432086X and 01741551
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........afdb604426b68263b506d93a044d2232