Effect of EGFR and ERBB2 amplifications and activating alterations on efficacy of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma

600 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is associated with a high mortality burden. Lenvatinib is an effective frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor for HCC but is associated with primary and acquired resistance in most patients. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to lenvatinib remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 227 patients with HCC who underwent baseline ctDNA profiling as a component of routine clinical care, including 46 patients who had serial ctDNA analysis done at baseline and after progression to lenvatinib or ICI. Clinical data including demographics, treatment history, tumor responses, and survival outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Tumor response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1. A national registry of HCC that underwent ctDNA testing using Guardant360 was analyzed to determine the prevalence of EGFR/ERBB2 alterations in HCC. Results: Nearly a third of patients who progressed on lenvatinib demonstrated a gain in EGFR/ ERBB2 amplifications or activating mutations. No consistent trend in EGFR/ ERBB2 amplifications and alterations was found among ICI refractory HCC. Disease control rates (including complete response, partial response, and stable disease) were 20% in EGFR/ERBB2 altered HCC treated with lenvatinib, 62.5% in EGFR/ERBB2 wildtype HCC treated with lenvatinib (p = 0.05), and 58% in EGFR/ERBB2 altered HCC treated with ICIs (p = 0.09). PFS was also longer in EGFR/ERBB2 wildtype HCC treated with lenvatinib (5.9 months) and EGFR/ERBB2 altered HCC treated with ICIs (7.1 months) compared to EGFR/ERBB2 altered HCC treated with lenvatinib (2.2 months, p = 0.002). In a national cohort of 1739 patients with HCC, EGFR amplifications and activating mutations occurred in 6.5% and 1.5% of cases, respectively, and ERBB2 amplifications and activating mutations occurred in 1.9% and 0.7% of cases, respectively. Among EGFR/ERBB2 mutations, we identified recurrent gatekeeper mutations, including multiple A547T and T790M mutations, in 31% of patients. Conclusions: Our study substantiates EGFR/ERBB2 amplifications and mutations as putative drivers of lenvatinib resistance in patients with HCC and identifies the genetic mechanisms for EGFR pathway activation in refractory cancers. EGFR/ERBB2 alterations may thus represent predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of lenvatinib resistance. These findings lend support to the use of EGFR inhibitors combined with lenvatinib in previously untreated or lenvatinib refractory cancers.