Back to Search
Start Over
Concurrency Analysis in Dynamic Dataflow Graphs
- Source :
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. 9:44-54
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2021.
-
Abstract
- Dynamic dataflow scheduling enables effective exploitation of concurrency while making parallel programming easier. To this end, analyzing the inherent degree of concurrency available in dataflow graphs is an important task, since it may aid compilers or programmers to assess the potential performance a program can achieve via parallel execution. However, traditional concurrency analysis techniques only work for DAGs (directed acyclic graphs), hence the need for new techniques that contemplate graphs with cycles. In this paper we present techniques to perform concurrency analysis on generic dynamic dataflow graphs, even in the presence of cycles. In a dataflow graph, nodes represent instructions and edges describe dependencies. The novelty of our approach is that we allow concurrency between different iterations of the loops. Consequently, a set of concurrent nodes may contain instructions from different loops that can be proven independent. In this work, we provide a set of theoretical tools for obtaining bounds and illustrate implementation of parallel dataflow runtime on a set of representative graphs for important classes of benchmarks to compare measured performance against derived bounds.
- Subjects :
- Computer science
Dataflow
Concurrency
Dynamic priority scheduling
Parallel computing
computer.software_genre
Directed acyclic graph
Graph
Computer Science Applications
Scheduling (computing)
Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Concurrent computing
Compiler
computer
Information Systems
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 23764562
- Volume :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........b2b3c895e3b52b4c4f4d1870447a5b92
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tetc.2018.2799078