Back to Search Start Over

A Mixture of LiMn2O4 and Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 As Positive Active Material of Lithium Ion Battery

Authors :
Ying Luo
Taolin Lu
Yixiao Zhang
Jingying Xie
Liqin Yan
Yi Feng
Source :
ECS Meeting Abstracts. :968-968
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
The Electrochemical Society, 2016.

Abstract

The high power and energy density of lithium ion batteries have made them one of the most attractive energy storage systems. Spinel type LiMn2O4 is considered for a promising material of Lithium ion batteries due to good safety, low cost, abundance, nontoxicity, and high-rate capability. However, poor cycle stability during repeated cycling occurs at room temperature and is more severe at high temperature, originating from the interplay of Jahn-Teller distortion of the lattice [1] and manganese dissolution [2], and retarding its implementation in commercial products. Lithium-rich layered oxide Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 possesses larger specific capacity and excellent cycle life at 2.75 ~ 4.2V, but slightly lower in high-rate discharge capability compared to LiMn2O4. Therefore, positive active material is the key in Lithium ion batteries for different application, and using mixed positive active material is an effective way to deal with the balance between energy density, power density and electrochemical performance for energy storage systems application. 18650 cells are subjected to evaluation tests using Li4Ti5O12 as the anode material, the mixture of LiMn2O4 and Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 as positive active material, 1.2 mol L-1 LiPF6 in mixture of EC:DMC:EMC (1:2:2 in weight) as electrolyte. The rate capability and cycling performance at different temperatures of the cells are investigated. For comparison, the 18650 LiMn2O4 / Li4Ti5O12 and Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 / Li4Ti5O12 cells are fabricated. The capacity plots of the three kinds of cells are shown in Fig.1. The voltage platform of Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 / Li4Ti5O12 cell is at around 2.2 V and 2.35 V, be lower than that of LiMn2O4 / Li4Ti5O12 cell of 2.5 V and 2.55 V, so the voltage platform of the cell using the mixture cathode material (LiMn2O4 : Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 =7:3 in weight) is slightly lower. This system with the mixture cathode material shows excellent capacity retention of 90% after 5000 cycles at 1C and room temperature. In particularly, the cyclic performance of the cells with the mixture cathode material is obviously improved with the capacity retention of 87% after 4000 cycles at 1C and 55 ◦C, compared with that of the LiMn2O4 / Li4Ti5O12 cell. As shown in Fig.2, the capacity of LiMn2O4 / Li4Ti5O12 cell is markedly fading before 100 cycles, owing to the manganese dissolution of LiMn2O4 at high temperature. But the fading trend is slower between 1000 cycles an 2700 cycles, and it may be due to the saturation of manganese dissolution, resulting from the high voltage platform of Li4Ti5O12 anode material with 1.55 V, unlike the carbon anode, for which significant deposition of manganese. In contrary, the capacity fading of the cell with the mixture cathode material is gentle, due to the introduction of Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2. Furthermore, the improved rate performance of the cells with the mixture cathode material also is observed with capacity retention of 85 % at 5 C (0.3C = 100%), compared with that of Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 / Li4Ti5O12 cell. Therefore, the mixture of LiMn2O4 and Li[Li0.167Ni0.225Co0.005Mn0.558]O2 is a promising alternative material to LiMn2O4for lithium ion battery. This work was supported by National 863 Program (No. 2013AA050902) and Shanghai technological innovation (No.14JC1491800). References [1] K.Y. Chung, K. Kim, Electrochim. Acta 49 (2004) 3327-3337. [2] L. Yang, M. Takahashi, B.F. Wang, Electrochim. Acta 51 (2006) 3228-3234. Figure 1

Details

ISSN :
21512043
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........b3fddb93a988f292c2710136d980fa2b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2016-03/2/968