Back to Search Start Over

The CO 2 stimulus duration and steady‐state time point used for data extraction alters the cerebrovascular reactivity outcome measure

Authors :
Claire V. Burley
Anna C. Whittaker
Rebekah A. I. Lucas
Samuel J. E. Lucas
Karen J. Mullinger
Source :
Experimental Physiology. 105:893-903
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

NEW FINDINGS What is the central question of this study? Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a common functional test to assess brain health, and impaired CVR has been associated with all-cause cardiovascular mortality: does the duration of the CO2 stimulus and the time point used for data extraction alter the CVR outcome measure? What is the main finding and its importance? This study demonstrated CVR measures calculated from 1 and 2 min CO2 stimulus durations were significantly higher than CVR calculated from a 4 min CO2 stimulus. CVRs calculated from the first 2 min of the CO2 stimulus were significantly higher than CVR values calculated from the final minute if the duration was ≥4 min. This study highlights the need for consistent methodological approaches. ABSTRACT Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide (CVR) is a common functional test to assess brain vascular health, though conflicting age and fitness effects have been reported. Studies have used different CO2 stimulus durations to induce CVR and extracted data from different time points for analysis. Therefore, this study examined whether these differences alter CVR and explain conflicting findings. Eighteen healthy volunteers (24 ± 5 years) inhaled CO2 for four stimulus durations (1, 2, 4 and 5 min) of 5% CO2 (in air) via the open-circuit Douglas bag method, in a randomized order. CVR data were derived from transcranial Doppler (TCD) measures of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), with concurrent ventilatory sensitivity to the CO2 stimulus ( VE,CO2 ). Repeated measures ANOVAs compared CVR and VE,CO2 measures between stimulus durations and steady-state time points. An effect of stimulus duration was observed (P = 0.002, η² = 0.140), with 1 min (P = 0.010) and 2 min (P

Details

ISSN :
1469445X and 09580670
Volume :
105
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Experimental Physiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........b85aac5bad413a281af788a24d50a932