Back to Search Start Over

Progression of conventional cardiovascular risk factors and vascular disease risk in individuals: insights from the PROG-IMT consortium

Authors :
Bahls, Martin
Lorenz, Matthias W
Dörr, Marcus
Gao, Lu
Kitagawa, Kazuo
Tuomainen, Tomi-Pekka
Agewall, Stefan
Berenson, Gerald
Catapano, Alberico L
Norata, Giuseppe D
Bots, Michiel L
Van Gilst, Wiek
Asselbergs, Folkert W
Brouwers, Frank P
Uthoff, Heiko
Sander, Dirk
Poppert, Holger
Hecht Olsen, Michael
Empana, Jean Philippe
Schminke, Ulf
Baldassarre, Damiano
Veglia, Fabrizio
Franco, Oscar H
Kavousi, Maryam
De Groot, Eric
Mathiesen, Ellisiv B
Grigore, Liliana
Polak, Joseph F
Rundek, Tatjana
Stehouwer, Coen DA
Skilton, Michael R
Hatzitolios, Apostolos I
Savopoulos, Christos
Ntaios, George
Plichart, Matthieu
McLachlan, Stela
Lind, Lars
Willeit, Peter
Steinmetz, Helmuth
Desvarieux, Moise
Ikram, M Arfan
Johnsen, Stein Harald
Schmidt, Caroline
Willeit, Johann
Ducimetiere, Pierre
Price, Jackie F
Bergström, Göran
Kauhanen, Jussi
Kiechl, Stefan
Sitzer, Matthias
Bickel, Horst
Sacco, Ralph L
Hofman, Albert
Völzke, Henry
Thompson, Simon G
Publisher :
SAGE Publications

Abstract

AIMS Averaged measurements, but not the progression based on multiple assessments of carotid intima-media thickness, (cIMT) are predictive of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in individuals. Whether this is true for conventional risk factors is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS An individual participant meta-analysis was used to associate the annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with future cardiovascular disease risk in 13 prospective cohort studies of the PROG-IMT collaboration (n = 34,072). Follow-up data included information on a combined cardiovascular disease endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death. In secondary analyses, annualised progression was replaced with average. Log hazard ratios per standard deviation difference were pooled across studies by a random effects meta-analysis. In primary analysis, the annualised progression of total cholesterol was marginally related to a higher cardiovascular disease risk (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.07). The annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not associated with future cardiovascular disease risk. In secondary analysis, average systolic blood pressure (HR 1.20 95% CI 1.11 to 1.29) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16) were related to a greater, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) was related to a lower risk of future cardiovascular disease events. CONCLUSION Averaged measurements of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol displayed significant linear relationships with the risk of future cardiovascular disease events. However, there was no clear association between the annualised progression of these conventional risk factors in individuals with the risk of future clinical endpoints.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........babb96872b953c699304343574b2b8d8