P1021Comparative efficacy of microfidelity technology vs standard ablation for atrioventricular nodal ablation

Background Microfidelity Cateter Technology has proven efficacy in ablating atrial arrhythmias in multiple pilot studies. Closely spaced radial microelectrodes render a focused near-field electrogram. Case series suggest that this catheter design facilitates accurate ablations with fewer radiofrequency (RF) lesions. Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation is regarded as a straightforward procedure, but case records show wide variance in procedure times and number of RF lesions required. Methods Twenty-four patients scheduled for AVJ ablation were randomized to treatment with either the Microfidelity technology or standard 8mm/8 French ablation catheter. Both groups located the AVJ by fluoroscopic landmarks and His electrograms, and the MiFi group used electroanatomical mapping to create the location of his electrograms. The primary endpoints were development of Junctional Rhythm (JR) or Complete Heart Block (CHB), and time from first RF lesion until rhythm change. Secondary endpoints included number of RF applications. Results Patients were randomized one-to-one to the MiFi arm or standard ablation arm. JR or CHB was achieved in all patients. Time from first RF lesion until JR/CHB was: (Median/IQR) 325 sec/250–1270 sec. vs 287 sec/101–406 sec. Number of RF applications was 5/3–15 applications vs 4.5/1–5 applications. Total procedure time in the lab was 134 min/73.5–172.5 min vs 58 min/52–146 min. Microfidelity Technology vs Standard Conclusion Analysis suggests that the MiFi catheter is efficacious in ablating the AVJ, but requires greater RF duration and number of lesions, with wider case-by-case variability to achieve JR or CHB. Microfidelity technology and electroanatomical mapping did not result in faster time to completion than using fluoroscopic landmarks and His electrograms alone. Preoperative choice of sheath for catheter stability and contact may also play a role in a more efficient timely successful ablation of the AV node. Acknowledgement/Funding Boston Scientific