Back to Search Start Over

Epistemic doubt and affective certainty: counting homotransphobia in Brazil

Authors :
Joseph Jay Sosa
Source :
Theory and Society. 52:95-117
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Statistics circulate with ambivalence in governance settings and mass publics—both extolled as authoritative knowledge and the object of distrustful scrutiny. In the field of human rights activism, where the means to create authoritative knowledge operates asymmetrically between activists, organizations, and state actors, this makes statistical production and circulation subject to an intense politics of knowledge. LGBTI human rights actors in Brazil, for instance, constantly produce numbers that endeavor to make homophobia and transphobia epistemically and affectively real to various audiences. From community surveys of personal experiences of violence or discrimination, to civil society reports of homicides, to federal government reports from human rights hotline complaints, LGBTI activists are awash in figures where they find themselves the producers, consumers, and subject material of such data. This article documents how activists and civil servants count violence, constructing homophobia and transphobia as knowable objects. These counting practices emerge from activists’ counterpublic circulations of knowledge about objects as well as epistemic infrastructures (police, journalistic coverage, hotlines) through which LGBTI peoples’ experience becomes refracted. Aware of these complications, activists deploy epistemic doubt and affective certainty to the field of statistics—utilizing the knowledge they offer while questioning whether violence can be measured at all.

Details

ISSN :
15737853 and 03042421
Volume :
52
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Theory and Society
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........c14072e9822377f5ac45431dce050b7f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09462-0