Back to Search Start Over

Additional prognostic value of OncoMasTR multigene prognostic signature to clinicopathological information in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative breast cancer from the TAILORx Tissue Bank, Ireland

Authors :
Anthony O'Grady
Peter Dynoodt
Catherine M. Kelly
William M. Gallagher
Tony Loughman
Bozena Fender
Darran P. O'Connor
Arman Rahman
Nebras Al Attar
Seodhna M. Lynch
Katherine M. Sheehan
Niamh Russell
Claudia Aura Gonzalez
Anurati Saha
Chan-Ju Angel Wang
Joanna Fay
John Crown
Stephen Barron
Desmond O'Leary
Adrian P. Bracken
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37:535-535
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2019.

Abstract

535 Background: Multigene prognostic signatures (MGPS) can identify early stage breast cancer patients who may require less aggressive treatment. To be clinically useful, MGPSs must provide additional prognostic information to clinicopathological information routinely used by clinicians. The OncoMasTR MGPS was discovered via a novel bioinformatic transcriptional network analysis. OncoMasTR consists of genes – Master Transcription Regulators (MTRs) – that regulate previously known prognostic genes and have identified functional roles in several hallmarks of cancer including proliferation, invasion and metastasis. The OncoMasTR Molecular Score (OM) consists of just 3 MTRs. The OncoMasTR Risk Score (OncoMasTR) combines OM with lymph node status and tumour size, and categorises patients as low or high risk. The OncoMasTR Test has been analytically and clinically validated. Methods: MTR expression was measured by RT-qPCR in tissue from 404 patients enrolled in an independent translational trial (NCT02050750) that collected tissue and clinical data from patients enrolled in TAILORx in Ireland. OM, OncoMasTR and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) were compared on the additional prognostic value they provided to Ki67, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and other clinicopathological information for distant recurrence (DR) and invasive disease (ID). Results: OM (LRχ2 = 20.3, p < 0.00001, c-index = 0.84) and OncoMasTR (LRχ2 = 22.6, p < 0.00001, c-index = 0.85) were significantly prognostic, and more prognostic than RS (LRχ2 = 8.4, p = 0.004, c-index = 0.73) for DR. OM and OncoMasTR provided more additional prognostic information than RS to Ki67, NPI, tumour size, tumour grade, and age for DR. Similar results were found when OM, OncoMasTR and RS were compared on prognostic performance for ID. Conclusions: OM and OncoMasTR were significantly prognostic for DR and ID and added significant prognostic value to Ki67, NPI, and other clinicopathological information. Furthermore, OM and OncoMasTR showed superior prognostic performance to RS.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........c540df0563f78a7299e3bee76889b7c8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.535