Back to Search Start Over

Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury

Authors :
Hutchinson, Peter J.
Kolias, Angelos G.
Tajsic, Tamara
Adeleye, Amos
Aklilu, Abenezer Tirsit
Apriawan, Tedy
Bajamal, Abdul Hafid
Barthélemy, Ernest J.
Devi, B. Indira
Bhat, Dhananjaya
Bulters, Diederik
Chesnut, Randall
Citerio, Giuseppe
Cooper, D. Jamie
Czosnyka, Marek
Edem, Idara
El-Ghandour, Nasser M.F.
Figaji, Anthony
Fountas, Kostas N.
Gallagher, Clare
Hawryluk, Gregory W.J.
Iaccarino, Corrado
Joseph, Mathew
Khan, Tariq
Laeke, Tsegazeab
Levchenko, Oleg
Liu, Baiyun
Liu, Weiming
Maas, Andrew
Manley, Geoffrey T.
Manson, Paul
Mazzeo, Anna T.
Menon, David K.
Michael, Daniel B.
Muehlschlegel, Susanne
Okonkwo, David O.
Park, Kee B.
Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.
Rosseau, Gail
Rubiano, Andres M.
Shabani, Hamisi K.
Stocchetti, Nino
Timmons, Shelly D.
Timofeev, Ivan
Uff, Chris
Ullman, Jamie S.
Valadka, Alex
Waran, Vicknes
Wells, Adam
Wilson, Mark H.
Servadei, Franco
Publisher :
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Abstract

Background: Two randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach. Methods: The International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017. The meeting was jointly organised by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), AO/Global Neuro and the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma. Discussions and voting were organised around six pre-specified themes: (1) primary DC for mass lesions, (2) secondary DC for intracranial hypertension, (3) peri-operative care, (4) surgical technique, (5) cranial reconstruction and (6) DC in low- and middle-income countries. Results: The invited participants discussed existing published evidence and proposed consensus statements. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval. Conclusions: In this manuscript, we present the final consensus-based recommendations. We have also identified areas of uncertainty, where further research is required, including the role of primary DC, the role of hinge craniotomy and the optimal timing and material for skull reconstruction.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........d479816b4da94f520298a092663b702d