Back to Search
Start Over
Unintended consequences of negative campaigning: Backlash and second-preference boost effects in a multi-party context
- Source :
- The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 21:612-629
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- SAGE Publications, 2019.
-
Abstract
- This study examines effects of negative campaigning by political parties on citizens’ electoral preferences in the 2015 General Election in England. We do so by using a large Internet panel study and an operationalisation of (perceived) negative campaigning that avoids social desirability. Our study acknowledges England’s multiparty system by distinguishing between the campaign tones of all parties. Potential problems of endogeneity are addressed by leveraging the panel structure of the data and by extensive controls. We find that electoral preferences are weakened for parties engaging in negative campaigning and that this backlash effect gets stronger over the course of the campaign. We also find support for a second-preferences boost hypothesis: preferences for one’s second-most preferred party are strengthened if its campaign is more positive than that of one’s most-preferred party.
- Subjects :
- Unintended consequences
business.industry
05 social sciences
050801 communication & media studies
Context (language use)
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Preference
0506 political science
Politics
0508 media and communications
Negative campaigning
General election
Political science
Political economy
Political Science and International Relations
050602 political science & public administration
The Internet
business
Backlash
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1467856X and 13691481
- Volume :
- 21
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........d5272b88fb428f491d42a1178bdfa934
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119842038