Back to Search Start Over

Additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery: Nationwide sample data analysis

Authors :
Woon Tak Yuh
Minjung Kim
Yunhee Choi
Junghoon Han
Junhoe Kim
Taeshin Kim
Chun Kee Chung
Chang-Hyun Lee
Sung Bae Park
Kyoung-Tae Kim
John M. Rhee
Moon Soo Park
Chi Heon Kim
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Research Square Platform LLC, 2022.

Abstract

Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical spinal disease are dependent on the selection of surgical techniques. Although a standardized decision cannot be made in an actual clinical setting, continued education is provided to standardize the medical practice among surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to supervise and regularly update overall surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the rate of additional surgery between anterior and posterior surgeries for degenerative cervical spinal disease using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) nationwide patient database. The NHIS-NSC is a population-based cohort with about a million participants. This retrospective cohort study included 741 adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent their first cervical spinal surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disease. The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. An event was defined as the registration of any type of cervical spinal surgery during the follow-up period. Event-free survival analysis was used for outcome analysis, and the following factors were used as covariates for adjustment: location of disease, sex, age, type of insurance, disability, type of hospital, Charles comorbidity Index, and osteoporosis. Anterior cervical surgery was selected for 75.0% of the patients, and posterior cervical surgery for the remaining 25.0%. Cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, hard disc, or soft disc was the primary diagnosis in 78.0% of the patients, and central spinal stenosis was the primary diagnosis in 22.0% of them. Additional surgery was performed for 5.0% of the patients after anterior cervical surgery and 6.5% of the patients after posterior cervical surgery (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.40–1.74). The rates of additional surgery were not different between anterior and posterior cervical surgeries. The results would be helpful in evaluating current practice as a whole and adjusting the health insurance policy.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........d886e5a7cb05134cb6c1756ce657d8aa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1780391/v1