Back to Search Start Over

Positivity rates and performances of immunochemical faecal occult blood tests at different cut-off levels within a colorectal cancer screening programme

Authors :
G. Durand
Jeanne Marie Bidan
Jean Faivre
Jérôme Viguier
Etienne Dorval
Bernard Denis
Christine Jard
Isabelle Gendre
Sylvain Manfredi
Romuald Levillain
Vincent Dancourt
Sylvie Jung
Source :
Digestive and Liver Disease. 44:700-704
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2012.

Abstract

Background Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have greater sensitivity for colorectal cancer screening than guaiac-based tests; however the number of positive tests required is still under discussion. Methods A direct comparison of Hemoccult II with two immunochemical quantitative tests (OC-Sensor and FOB-Gold) using a 2-sample strategy was performed in over 30,000 patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening in France. Results Positivity ratio between immunochemical tests and Hemoccult II varied between 2.2 (OC-Sensor) and 2.4 (FOB-Gold) for the lowest cut-off value and 1.5–1.4 for the highest cut-off value. The positive predictive value for colorectal cancer was similar for immunochemical tests and Hemoccult II, and significantly higher for immunochemical tests for advanced adenomas. The detection rate of both colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas was higher with immunochemical tests than with Hemoccult II. With the 2-sample strategy and the lowest cut-off value the detection rate of colorectal cancer almost doubled and for advanced adenomas quadrupled. Conclusion For colorectal cancer screening with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests, an acceptable strategy would be 2-day sampling with at least one positive test at a cut-off between 150 and 200 ng/mL (OC-Sensor) and 176 and 234 ng/mL (FOB-Gold). Data on the ease of test interpretation and cost-effectiveness now necessary to make definitive choices.

Details

ISSN :
15908658
Volume :
44
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Digestive and Liver Disease
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........d980b27a2d9a3792b96834a710a6f143
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2012.03.015