Back to Search Start Over

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Authors :
Christos Georgalas
Sandra Y. Lin
Stilianos E. Kountakis
Pete S. Batra
Luke Rudmik
Richard A. Lebowitz
Elina Toskala
Jeremiah A. Alt
Michael G. Stewart
Robert M. Naclerio
Neil Bhattacharyya
David W. Kennedy
Andrew P. Lane
Donald C. Lanza
Joseph K. Han
Hun Jong Dhong
Amber U Luong
Alexander G. Chiu
Martin Desrosiers
Wytske Fokkens
Jayakar V. Nayak
Brent A. Senior
Rodney J. Schlosser
Bradford A. Woodworth
Raj Sindwani
Todd T. Kingdom
Peter Hellings
Robert C. Kern
Hwan Jung Roh
Andrew N. Goldberg
Alkis J. Psaltis
Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
Amin R. Javer
Richard G. Douglas
Richard J. Harvey
Tim Smith
Martin J. Citardi
David M. Poetker
Jay F. Piccirillo
Claire Hopkins
Erin D. Wright
Richard Louis Voegels
Sarah K. Wise
Hassan H. Ramadan
Anju T. Peters
Raymond Sacks
Bing Zhou
Daniel L. Hamilos
Fuad M. Baroody
Noam A. Cohen
Desiderio Passali
Nobuyoshi Otori
Vijay R. Ramakrishnan
Wolf Mann
Erik K. Weitzel
Bruce K. Tan
Sanjay R. Parikh
Kevin C. McMains
James A. Stankiewicz
Roger Jankowski
Ralph Metson
Valerie J. Lund
Jan Gosepath
Peter H. Hwang
Marek L. Kowalski
Bradley F. Marple
Berrylin J. Ferguson
Rakesh K. Chandra
Heung Man Lee
Herbert Riechelmann
De Yun Wang
John M. DelGaudio
Richard R. Orlandi
Peter-John Wormald
James N. Palmer
Source :
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. 6:S22-S209
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Wiley, 2016.

Abstract

Background The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis(RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS). Methods Evidence-based reviews with recommendations(EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR)was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS)with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AECRS), and pediatric RS. Conclusion As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too often the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lower level evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed.

Details

ISSN :
20426976
Volume :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........dbbede4444343240e6f8dcfac2dd23e9