Back to Search Start Over

Wind Power Generator Embodied Energy Payback Analysis for Rural Area in Paraná-Brazil

Authors :
Abel Alves de Souza
Benhurt Gongora
Ricardo Muller
Bruna Pereira da Silva
Reginaldo Ferreira Santos
Amauri Ghellere Garcia Miranda
Luciene Kazue Tokura
Samuel Nelson Melegari de Souza
Reinaldo Prandini Ricieri
Leonardo da Silva Reis
Fernando Luiz da Cruz Belana
Natália Pereira
Jair Antonio Cruz Siqueira
Lucas Lourenço Corrêa
Source :
Journal of Agricultural Science. 11:437
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Canadian Center of Science and Education, 2019.

Abstract

Over the last decades, wind energy has been named as a clean method to generate electrical power. But, to claim this argument many aspects must be evaluated. On one hand, wind power, as an electrical energy source, generates minimum environmental impact when in operation. On the other side, the material extraction for the manufacturing process does create environmental impact and require electrical energy usage. Therefore, when claiming the sustainability of wind power, as a method of electrical power generation, many aspects must be evaluated, such as the Life Cycle Analysis of the turbine. This study has been taken to evaluate the energy cost and its payback period off the wind power turbine S-600, manufactured by Greatwatt, has being evaluated. This evaluation has covered the embodied energy in the gross material present on the final product and its energetic payback period, for the specific case of working in a rural area in the state of Paraná, Brazil. The ISO 14040 methodology, for life cycle analyses, has being applied to estimate the embodied energy in the gross material present on the generator. The annual average energetic production estimation has considered 4 cases, varying the voltage output and hub height, and the nominal capacity, claimed by the manufacturing company. To assess the embodied energy payback period, the theoretical generation capacity has been estimated. Thus, by this analysis, this article has concluded that the embodied energy in the gross material is 803.39MJ. The energetic payback period for this product, at 10 meters hub height, is 11.6 months, if operating on 12 V, and 12.6 months, if operation on 24 V. Furthermore, in the situation of installed at 30 meters from the ground, the energy payback period drops down to 5.3 and 5.5 months, operating on 12 or 24 V respectively. In the situation of nominal generation, the energetic payback period would dropdown to 4.6 and 3.1 months, operating on 12 or 24 V respectively.

Details

ISSN :
19169760 and 19169752
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Agricultural Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e08b7695c7ec90a3295cb8a16dbb759b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n6p437