Back to Search Start Over

Erythrocyte Adhesion and Phosphatidylserine Exposure in HbSC Disease: Baseline Data from the CHAMPS Study

Authors :
Cathie Snyder
Marilyn J. Telen
Winfred C. Wang
Martha Delahunty
Source :
Blood. 112:2478-2478
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
American Society of Hematology, 2008.

Abstract

Red blood cells (RBCs) in sickle cell anemia are characterized by increased adhesion to laminin and endothelial cells, due both to increased adhesion receptor expression as well as receptor activation. However, these RBC properties have not been comprehensively evaluated in HbSC disease. In the on-going multi-center CHAMPS trial, all subjects have a diagnosis of HbSC disease and have had at least one significant vaso-occlusive event in the previous 12 months (but none in the previous 4 weeks). All subjects are at least 5 years of age (median 13.4 yr, range = 5.2–53.3 yr) at enrollment. Subjects receive hydroxyurea (HU) and/or magnesium pidolate (Mg) (or their placebos); endpoints include the effect of study drugs on erythrocyte density and RBC-endothelial interactions. To characterize the adhesive properties of RBCs at baseline in these patients, we performed the following analyses on blood samples shipped to a central lab at Duke University from 11 participating sites: adhesion to laminin at 1 dyne/cm2 shear stress; adhesion to endothelial cells after epinephrine (epi) stimulation of RBCs at shear stress of 1 dyne/cm2; and phosphatidylserine exposure, as measured by mean fluorescence intensity after binding of fluoresceinated annexin V. Most subjects had two pre-treatment specimens analyzed. Analysis of the first 83 samples (47 patients) showed that a mean of 1.64% (± 0.15% SEM) of circulating HbSC RBCs expressed phosphatidylserine, or a little less than half as many as in HbSS RBC samples (4.12% positive ± .91% SEM, n = 29) tested as controls (HbSC vs HbSS p=.0009). However HbSC RBCs were also different from HbAA RBCs (1.076% positive, n = 5), and all three sets of values were significantly different by ANOVA (p = .0017) (Figure). The two baseline visits for HbSC subjects resulted in nearly identical means of 1.64% and 1.65%, respectively. Adhesion of HbSC red cells to laminin at baseline was quite variable among patients, with a mean of 36.1 adherent cells/mm2 (range 2–256). This was slightly but not significantly lower than the values obtained using HbSS control RBCs (mean 58.8 cells/mm2, range 0.2–258). After epi stimulation of RBCs, 9.6% of cells adhered to endothelial monolayers at 1 dyne/cm2, whereas 14.8% of HbSS RBCs were adherent (p = .186). HbAA RBCs showed minimal adhesion in both assays (< 5 cells/mm2 and Figure Figure

Details

ISSN :
15280020 and 00064971
Volume :
112
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Blood
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e13ab9590c13f05bdc82c35bc4e7d4f8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v112.11.2478.2478