Back to Search Start Over

A Blinded, Prospective Study of Error Detection During Physician Chart Rounds in Radiation Oncology

Authors :
Suzanne B. Evans
Pehr E. Hartvigson
Jacqueline R. Kelly
Lauren Tressel
H. Lincoln
Todd Pawlicki
Roy H. Decker
Eric C. Ford
Wesley J. Talcott
Lynn D. Wilson
Source :
Practical Radiation Oncology. 10:312-320
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose Peer review during physician chart rounds is a major quality assurance and patient safety step in radiation oncology. However, the effectiveness of chart rounds in detecting problematic treatment plans is unknown. We performed a prospective blinded study of error detection at chart rounds to clarify the effectiveness of this quality assurance step. Methods and Materials Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System publications were queried for problematic plans approved for treatment that would be detectable at chart rounds. A resident physician, physicist, and dosimetrist collaboratively generated 20 treatment plans with simulated errors identical in nature to those reported to the Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System. These were inserted randomly into weekly chart rounds over 9 weeks, with a median of 2 problematic plans presented per chart rounds (range, 1-4). Data were collected on detection, attendance, length, and number of cases presented at chart rounds. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariable logistic regression with odds ratios. Results The median length of chart rounds over the study period was 60 minutes (range, 42-79); median number of cases presented per chart rounds was 45 (range, 38-50). The overall detection rate was 55% (11 of 20). Detection rates were higher for cases presented earlier in chart rounds: 75% versus 25% of problematic plans were detected within 30 minutes of start of chart rounds versus after 30 minutes (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.88; P = .037). Detection rates showed a trend toward increase during the study period but this was not significant: 33% in weeks 1 to 5 and 73% during weeks 6 to 9 (5.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–36; P = .08). Conclusions The detection of clinically significant problematic plans during chart rounds could be significantly improved. Problematic plans are more frequently detected earlier in chart rounds and inserting such plans into chart rounds may enhance detection; however, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. A multi-institutional study is planned.

Details

ISSN :
18798500
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Practical Radiation Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e15265e93abec35f7aad4334fc662e4c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.012