Back to Search Start Over

Optimizing Short-format Training: an International Consensus on Effective, Inclusive, and Career-spanning Professional Development in the Life Sciences and Beyond

Authors :
Jason J. Williams
Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Bérénice Batut
Erin A. Becker
Anne M. Brown
Melissa L. Burke
Ben Busby
Nisha K. Cooch
Allissa A. Dillman
Samuel S. Donovan
Maria A. Doyle
Celia W.G. van Gelder
Christina R. Hall
Kate L. Hertweck
Kari L. Jordan
John R. Jungck
Ainsley R. Latour
Jessica M. Lindvall
Marta Lloret-Llinares
Gary S. McDowell
Rana Morris
Teresa Mourad
Amy Nisselle
Patricia Ordóñez
Lisanna Paladin
Patricia M. Palagi
Mahadeo A. Sukhai
Tracy K. Teal
Louise Woodley
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2023.

Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) fields change rapidly and are increasingly interdisciplinary. Commonly, STEMM practitioners use short-format training (SFT) such as workshops and short courses for upskilling and reskilling, but unaddressed challenges limit SFT’s effectiveness and inclusiveness. Prior work, including the NSF 2026 Reinventing Scientific Talent proposal, called for addressing SFT challenges, and a diverse international group of experts in education, accessibility, and life sciences came together to do so. This paper describes the phenomenography and content analyses that produced a set of 14 actionable recommendations to systematically strengthen SFT. Recommendations were derived from findings in the educational sciences and the experiences of several of the largest life science SFT programs. Recommendations cover the breadth of SFT contexts and stakeholder groups and include actions for instructors (e.g., make equity and inclusion an ethical obligation), programs (e.g., centralize infrastructure for assessment and evaluation), as well as organizations and funders (e.g., professionalize training SFT instructors; deploy SFT to counter inequity). Recommendations are aligned into a purpose-built framework— “The Bicycle Principles”—that prioritizes evidenced-based teaching, inclusiveness, and equity, as well as the ability to scale, share, and sustain SFT. We also describe how the Bicycle Principles and recommendations are consistent with educational change theories and can overcome systemic barriers to delivering consistently effective, inclusive, and career-spanning SFT.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSTEMM practitioners need sustained and customized professional development to keep up with innovations. Short-format training (SFT) such as workshops and short-courses are relied upon widely but have unaddressed limitations. This project generated principles and recommendations to make SFT consistently effective, inclusive, and career-spanning. Optimizing SFT could broaden participation in STEMM by preparing practitioners more equitably with transformative skills. Better SFT would also serve members of the STEMM workforce who have several decades of productivity ahead, but who may not benefit from education reforms that predominantly focus on undergraduate STEMM. The Bicycle Principles and accompanying recommendations apply to any SFT instruction and may be especially useful in rapidly evolving and multidisciplinary fields such as artificial intelligence, genomics, and precision medicine.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e3b8517b953f06b31d58f4086ac35e06
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.10.531570