NOA-08 randomized phase III trial of 1-week-on/1-week-off temozolomide versus involved-field radiotherapy in elderly (older than age 65) patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma (Methusalem)

LBA2001 Background: The median survival time for elderly patients (pts) with malignant gliomas is in the range of a few months. Radiotherapy (RT) is the standard treatment and superior to best supportive care both with respect to progression-free and overall survival. The benefit derived from surgery and RT is modest, and both treatments are less well tolerated in elderly pts than in the young. The availability of a potentially effective pharmacological agent, temozolomide (TMZ), for malignant glioma, which exhibits a favorable safety profile, necessitated a reconsideration of the widespread therapeutic nihilism with malignant glioma in the elderly. Methods: The NOA-08 trial of the Neurooncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society compared standard postsurgical involved-field RT to a dose of 54-60 Gy, in pts with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma > 65 ys with a Karnofsky performance score ≥ 60, to TMZ in an one week on/one week off schedule at 100 mg/m2 with dose modification in 25 mg steps in both directions. The primary endpoint was the median survival time (OS) during the follow-up in the 12 months after date of operation. The trial sought to demonstrate the non-inferiority of TMZ compared with RT. Regarding a maximal difference of 25% between both treatment arms in OS as being equivalent, 2 x 206 pts were randomized between May 15, 2005 and Nov 2, 2009 in 22 German and one Suisse sites to provide 80% power to achieve significance at a one-sided level of 0.05. Thirty-nine patients were excluded from the intention-to-treat (ITT) population because no therapy was applied (n=22) or withdrawal of informed consent (n=17). Results: All histological diagnoses were centrally confirmed. Pts characteristics were balanced between arms in the ITT population (n=373) except for more resections and more anaplastic astrocytomas in the RT arm. The non-inferiority of TMZ was not shown. In contrast, pts in the TMZ arm had an increased risk of death (HR=1.24 [95% CI: 0.94-1.63]) compared to pts in the RT arm. The rate of adverse and serious adverse events was higher in the TMZ arm. Conclusions: This trial fails to show the non-inferiority of dose-intensified TMZ alone compared with RT alone in the primary treatment of older pts with malignant glioma. Unlike anaplastic glioma in the younger patient population, RT cannot be safely deferred in the treatment of elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Whether RT plus TMZ is superior to RT alone, is addressed in the ongoing companion trial conducted by NCIC, EORTC and TROG. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]