Back to Search Start Over

Safety of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ site admissions within a high volume urology department in the United Kingdom at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors :
Marios Hadjipavlou
Jane Cossins
Ella Di Benedetto
J. Glass
Jonathon Olsburgh
Anna Walsh
Nick Simson
Pinky Kotecha
Benjamin Challacombe
Bethany Jackson
Arun Sahai
Rajesh Nair
Jonah Rusere
Ramandeep Chalokia
Oussama El Hage
Raveen Sandher
Findlay MacAskill
Harold Omana
Grace Zisengwe
Prokar Dasgupta
Beth Russell
Rick Popert
Anastasia Kantartzi
Thomasia Azavedo
Kathryn Chatterton
Luke Stroman
Louisa Fleure
Elsie Mensah
Tim O'Brien
Matthew Bultitude
Adeoye Oluwakanyinsola Debo-Aina
Meghana Kulkarni
Leslie Cooper
Muhammad Shamim Khan
Jeffrey Ritualo
Amelia Barber
Lily Studd
Yamini Kailash
Paul Cathcart
Katherine Guest
Li June Tay
Sharon Clovis
Majed Shabbir
Vugar Ismaylov
Liza Mills
Luis Felipe Ribeiro
Christian Brown
Sachin Malde
Rhana Zakri
Kay Thomas
Tet Yap
Susan Willis
Cassandra McDonald
Ramesh Thurairaja
Archana Fernando
Francesca Kum
Ella Doerge
Elizabeth Eversden
Claire Taylor
Catherine Roberts
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2020.

Abstract

BackgroundContracting COVID-19 peri-operatively has been associated with a mortality rate as high as 23%, making prevention vital.ObjectivesThe primary objective is to determine safety of surgical admissions and procedures during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic using ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ sites. The secondary objective is to determine risk factors of contracting COVID-19.Design, Setting and ParticipantsA retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients admitted from 1st March – 31st May 2020 at a high-volume tertiary urology department in London, United Kingdom. Elective surgery was carried out at a ‘cold’ site requiring a negative COVID-19 swab 72 hours prior to admission and to self-isolate for 14 days pre-operatively, whilst all acute admissions were admitted to the ‘hot’ site.Outcome Measurements and Statistical AnalysisComplications related to COVID-19 were presented as percentages. Risk factors for developing COVID-19 infection were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results and LimitationsA total of 611 patients, 451 (73.8%) male and 160 (26.2%) female, with a median age of 57 (interquartile range 44-70) were admitted under the urology team; 101 (16.5%) on the ‘cold’ site and 510 (83.5%) on the ‘hot’ site. Procedures were performed in 495 patients of which 8 (1.6%) contracted COVID-19 post-operatively with 1 (0.2%) post-operative mortality due to COVID-19. Overall, COVID-19 was detected in 20 (3.3%) patients with 2 (0.3%) deaths. Length of stay was associated with contracting COVID-19 in our cohort (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.39). Limitations include possible under reporting due to post-operative patients presenting elsewhere.ConclusionsContinuation of surgical procedures using ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ sites throughout the COVID-19 pandemic was safe practice, although the risk of COVID-19 remained and is underlined by a post-operative mortality.Patient SummaryUsing ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ sites has allowed the safe continuation of urological practice throughout the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........e67222a71e8518eb94345c64bb3d1676
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.20154203